· 3/18/1966
Aircraft Associates & Mfg. Co., Inc. v. The United States
Citations
- 357 F.2d 373
- 174 Ct. Cl. 886
- 1966 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 173
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding a valid claim of economic duress when the government had breached a valid contract and thereby had “contributed to plaintiff’s financial difficulties”
- duress established with respect to release under sales contract where Government knew of scavenging of subject matter, settlement offer was disproportionate, and Government demanded immediate settlement
- “the law is settled that the [as-is/where-is language] must be given effect____[this] standard provision of Government disposal contracts is neither unduly broad nor oppressive.”
- “Economic duress may not be implied merely from the making of a hard bargain.”
- release held invalidated by duress
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cowen, Laramore, Durfee, Davis, Collins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.