Air-Sea Forwarders, Inc. v. Air Asia Company, Ltd., and E-Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no appellate jurisdiction exists over claims the district court did not include in its Rule 54(b) order
• finding that recusal was not necessary where the district court stated that counsel had “‘misled’ the jury by blowing ‘cloak and dagger smoke’ at it”
• no appellate jurisdiction exists over claims the district court did not include it is Rule 54(b) order
• on appeal from a Rule 54(b) order, there is no jurisdiction over claims that are not within the scope of that order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).