· 5/6/1998
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. v. United States
Citations
- 14 F. Supp. 2d 737
- 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 433
- 22 C.I.T. 433
- 20 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1528
- 1998 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 49
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the goal of Commerce’s FOPs methodologies should be “to construct the product’s price ... using the best information available regarding surrogate values,” emphasis suppled, citation omitted
- noting that the use of data from two producers of the subject merchandise “comports with Congress’ intent that the Department use relevant data on production of the same class or kind of merchandise.”
- affirming Commerce’s finding of no de jure government control even though the company’s business license restricts the scope of its business in the PRC
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pogue
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.