Aileen H. Char Life Interest v. Maricopa County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “police cannot justify an otherwise unlawful search of a residence because, unbeknownst to the police, a resident of the dwelling was on parole and subject to a search condition”
• stating “the usual rule [is] that a plaintiff must establish each element of a civil action by a preponderance of the evidence”
• stating “the usual rule [is] that a plaintiff must establish each element of a civil action by a preponderance of the evidence”
• affirming the tax court’s ruling on a post-judgment Rule 60 motion for relief from judgment
• rejecting argument prevailing taxpayers entitled to only one award for multiple parties represented by same attorney because “if the legislature had intended to limit the statute ..., it would have used language making that limitation clear”
• explaining the court’s reliance upon one of the Department’s manuals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).