Aikens v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that generally, time is not of the essence in proving a criminal offense
• stating that generally, time is not of the essence in proving a criminal offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Baxter v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1988-04-25· cited 69×
• Monserrate v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1976-08-17· cited 26×
• Thurman v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1974-11-27· cited 26×
• Quillen v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1979-07-19· cited 22×
• R.L.H. v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-11-15· cited 17×
• Sangsland v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1999-08-04· cited 11×
• Robb v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1970-02-05· cited 9×
• Mentzer v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1973-05-23· cited 5×
• Baxter v. Duckworth
  N.D. Indiana· 1989-02-10· cited 3×
• RLH v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-11-15
• James A. Love v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-05-25

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Madison v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1955-11-04· cited 77×
• Lámar v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1964-01-08· cited 56×
• Denton v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1965-01-14· cited 39×
• Lamar v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1964-01-08· cited 36×
• Lake v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1971-10-22· cited 32×
• Napier v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1971-02-04· cited 29×