Skip to main content
· 6/21/2013

Aikens v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 950 F. Supp. 2d 186
  • 2013 WL 3119303
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[i]n the absence of a ‘fundamental change in’ or ‘elimination of’ a basic element of [the student’s] educational program” when she was moved to a different school, there had been “no change in educational placement” and the student was not denied a FAPE

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Rosemary M. Collyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.