Aiken v. Southern Pacific Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that the plaintiff’s failure to conduct a survey “demonstrate[d] that confusion is not likely”
• discussing “genericide” in context of claimed mark in “Comic Con” name and noting that “|g]eneric terms are not protectable because they do identify the source of a product.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).