A.I.G. Uruguay Compania De Seguros, S.A. v. AAA Cooper Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where shipment is in a sealed container, a bill of lading without more is insufficient to establish a prima facie Carmack Amendment case
• hypothesizing in a shipping case that this Court would \accept[ ] circumstantial evidence for the requisite proof\ of cargo damage even under the heightened standard applied in sealed container cases
• after liability is established, “[t]he inquiry then becomes the amount of damages and, usually, whether the carrier legitimately limited its liability for the shipment to a specified value or amount”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).