Skip to main content
· 9/15/2011

AIG Premier Insurance v. RLI Insurance

Citations

  • 812 F. Supp. 2d 1315
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107311
  • 2011 WL 4347197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “shall not contribute” language is not distorted if treated as equal to another excess clause without such language and enforcing mutual repugnancy between two similar clauses
  • rejecting argument that, under Florida law, one excess clause could be “excess to all other excess insurance”
  • comparing Florida law with New York law, which does allow for departure from ratable contribution when it would distort plain meaning
  • “The delivery of the policy can constitute the ‘last act’ necessary to execute a contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anne C. Conway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.