S.D. New York· 10/12/1999
Aiena v. Olsen
Citations
- 69 F. Supp. 2d 521
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15773
- 1999 WL 816169
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- after an employee has retired, an employer’s right to amend a “top hat” retirement plan “depends upon the clarity with which the plan reserves that right”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kaplan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.