Aiello v. Litscher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when inmates have filed a grievance regarding a prison policy, they need not file grievances regarding subsequent incidents in which the policy is applied
• indicating that neither record evidence nor common sense suggests that legitimate prison objectives are advanced by banning \great works of art and literature\
• denying prison officials’ motion for summary judgment in part because they “failed to submit any credible evidence” of a rational connection between banning “great works of art” and promoting rehabilitation, “and common sense suggests none”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).