Aidone v. Nationwide Auto Guard, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding, in the corporate context: “When a foreign corporation is doing business in the United States, is subject to the court’s jurisdiction, and has freely taken advantage of our federal rules of discovery, exceptions to the general rule on the location of depositions are often made”
• “If a federal court compels discovery on foreign soil, foreign judicial sovereignty may be infringed . . .” (citation omitted)
• Rule 30(b)(6) depositions would occur in Illinois or Indiana because proceeding in principal place of business in Japan would compromise the court's authority to resolve discovery disputes and raise sovereignty issues
• “[A] foreign corporation, subject to the in personam jurisdiction of this court, can be ordered under Rule 30(b)(6) to produce its officers, directors or managing agents in the United States to give deposition testimony.”
• collecting No. 13-3898 11 cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).