Aida M. Rios v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding jurisdiction lacking to review denial on res judicata grounds and refusal to reopen, even where hearing had been held
• hearing held by ALJ to consider new evidence prior to dismissal of hearing request on res judicata grounds held not to be \a 'hearing' within the meaning of 405(g)\
• hearing held by ALJ to consider new evidence prior to dismissal of hearing request on res judicata grounds held not to be \a 'hearing' within the meaning of 405(g)\
• no jurisdiction to review a denial of benefits on basis of res judicata because purely discretionary hearing not a “hear ing” for purposes of jurisdiction under § 405(g)
• “A purely discretionary hearing [held for] purposes of receiving allegedly new and material evidence is not a “hearing” within the meaning of § 405(g).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).