Aida Feliciano v. Reliant Tooling Company, Ltd. And Union Special Corporation, Sun Alliance and London Insurance, Limited

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “loss of available evidence, increased potential for fraud or collusion, or substantial reliance upon the [default] judgment” support a showing of prejudice
• concluding that any doubt should be resolved in favor of granting relief so that cases will be heard on the merits
• holding that the “loss of available evidence, increased potential for fraud or collusion, or substantial reliance upon the [default] judgment” support a showing of prejudice
• explaining that the same factors that constitute \good cause\ under Rule 55(c) govern the lifting of default judgments under Rule 60(b)
• concluding that delay in satisfaction of judgment is not a significant prejudice
• explaining that “loss of available evidence, increased potential for fraud or collusion, or substantial reliance upon the judgment to support a finding of prejudice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).