Skip to main content
· 4/6/2001

Aida Dayton Technologies Corp. v. I.T.O. Corp. of Baltimore

Citations

  • 137 F. Supp. 2d 637
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5877
  • 2001 WL 357294

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting summary judgment based on limitations provisions in bill of lading because claims for indemnification and contribution do not accrue until its liability for damage is determined by judgment or payment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harvey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.