A.I. Ex Rel. Iapalucci v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an IEP must include, among other things, a statement regarding “the child’s ability to interact with non-disabled children”
• noting that procedural violations that seriously infringe upon the parents’ opportunity to participate in the IEP formulation process clearly result in a denial of a FAPE
• explaining that hearing officers are responsible for determining “how much weight to give the evidence”
• observing that omission of certain required information from IEPs does not violate right to FAPE if the missing information was nonetheless known to all parties at the time
• noting that procedural violations that seriously infringe upon the parents’ opportunity to participate in the IEP formulation process clearly result in a denial of a FAPE
• finding no harm to a student’s education because the school district became aware of the IEE’s results and incorporated them into the student’s IEP program

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).