Ahuja v. Detica Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that plaintiff only had claims based on discrete acts of discrimination once the Court had dismissed a hostile work environment claim, and 12 accordingly, plaintiff could not rely upon the continuing violation doctrine
• holding that plaintiff failed to exhaust her administrative remedies for her ADEA claim after “omitt[ing] a single explicit allegation of being discriminated against based on her age in the over eight pages, single space description” of her intake questionnaire
• taking judicial notice of an EEOC Complaint and Notice of Charge on motion to dismiss without converting motion to one for summary judgment
• stating that, as an exception to the rule that the Court may not consider attachments to a motion to dismiss, that it “may [ ] consider [the p]laintiff’s EEOC Complaint and Notice of Charge” attached to the defendant’s motion
• converting motion to dismiss into motion for summary judgment in order to resolve .defendant's arguments that plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies
• converting a motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment because the parties relied on exhibits beyond the Plaintiff’s EEOC complaint and notice of charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).