Ahrens v. Bowen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that it was not clearly erroneous for the District Court to conclude that it was “far from remote or unlikely that the plaintiffs may again become recipients of punitive damages under New York Social Services Law § 131–o.”
• affirming district court finding that announcement of change “on the eve of plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment” suggested that it was merely “an attempt … to conjure up an argument for mootness and thwart adjudication of the issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).