Skip to main content
· 3/8/1967

Aho v. United States

Citations

  • 272 F. Supp. 990
  • 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that public policy concerns that favor the finality of judgments focus on the “judicial proceedings and the collateral impacts such absence of finality might have on the development of decisional law,” which are not typically at issue in a foreclosure action.
  • explaining that public policy concerns that favor the finality of judgments focus on the “judicial proceedings and the collateral impacts such absence of finality might have on the development of decisional law,” which are not typically at issue in a foreclosure action.
  • “New York’s public policy favors restoring the ee ae | parties to the lending arrangement positions they occupied before the events which led to default and foreclosure.”
  • “[c]ourts are more likely to exclude damages 13 evidence when a party first discloses its computation of damages shortly before trial or 14 substantially after discovery has closed.”
  • “Lesser sanctions and other measures are generally more || appropriate than evidence preclusion when the disclosure is provided during the discovery 4|| period and the delay can be remedied during the existing discovery period or with a limited 5|| and brief extension of discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heebe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.