Aho v. Bintz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• neither 29 U.S.C. § 411 nor § 501 authorizes claim against employer or union pension fund
• “On its face, [§ 501] does not apply, nor was it intended to apply to actions against employers or labor organizations.”
• “[a]n argument can perhaps be made that the statute in fact allows suit against officers and representatives of the International. By virtue of belonging to [the local] plaintiffs herein are members of [the International].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).