Skip to main content
· 5/9/2017

Ahmed v. Astoria Bank

Citations

  • 690 F. App'x 49

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding CUTSA preempted claim of conversion of property, including “certain documents and data and computer data discs,” that was indistinguishable from the alleged trade secret material
  • noting “mere 22 fulfillment of the terms of a ‘permanent’ agreement executed outside the limitations period” is 23 insufficient
  • denying a UCL claim as pre-empted after dismissing a CUTSA claim
  • conversion claim preempted by 14 the CUTSA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lohier, Lynch, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.