· 5/9/2017
Ahmed v. Astoria Bank
Citations
- 690 F. App'x 49
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding CUTSA preempted claim of conversion of property, including “certain documents and data and computer data discs,” that was indistinguishable from the alleged trade secret material
- noting “mere 22 fulfillment of the terms of a ‘permanent’ agreement executed outside the limitations period” is 23 insufficient
- denying a UCL claim as pre-empted after dismissing a CUTSA claim
- conversion claim preempted by 14 the CUTSA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lohier, Lynch, Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.