Ahmed Bhiski v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States the United States Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the permissive term “may” in Notice of Appeal Form EOIR-26 suggests “that the agency believes that a brief is not necessary in all cases”
• explaining that petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel argument was exhausted despite his failure to aver, in the Notice of Appeal, that he suffered prejudice, and despite his failure to file a supporting brief
• explaining that petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel argument was exhausted despite his failure to aver, in the Notice of Appeal, that he suffered prejudice, and despite his failure to file a supporting brief
• upholding the sufficiency of an administrative notice of appeal that made “the BIA aware of precisely what issues were being appealed”
• “[W]e have previously examined the failure to enter a continuance absent counsel under an abuse of discretion standard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).