Ahmad J. Hasan v. George M. Galaza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “to have the factual predicate for a habeas petition based on 22 ineffective assistance of counsel, a petitioner must have discovered (or with the exercise of due 23 diligence could have discovered
• concluding that “to 24 have the factual predicate for a habeas petition based on ineffective assistance of counsel, a 25 petitioner must have discovered (or with the exercise of due diligence could have discovered
• noting that the limitation period under § 2244(d)(1)(D) begins running when petitioner knew of facts underlying the claims, not when he realized their “legal significance”
• stating that the statute of limitations begins to run when petitioner knows the important facts, not when their legal significance is recognized
• noting that the limitation period under § 2244(d)(1)(D) begins running when petitioner knew of facts underlying the claims, not when he realized their “legal significance”
• noting that the time begins when the important facts are known, not when the facts’ legal significance is known

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).