Skip to main content
· 7/1/1994

Ahmad Baravati v. Josephthal, Lyon & Ross, Incorporated, and Peter Sheib

Citations

  • 28 F.3d 704
  • 9 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1127
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 16587
  • 1994 WL 314348

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that judicial review of arbitration awards under the FAA was so “tightly limited” that “perhaps it ought not be called ‘review’ at all”
  • stating as qualification that \[t]his disagreement does not bear directly on the present case\
  • stating as qualification that “[t]his disagreement does not bear directly on the present case”
  • rejecting the idea that a court reviews even for clear error
  • “Judicial review of arbitration awards is tightly limited; perhaps it ought not be called ‘review’ at all.”
  • “It is commonplace to leave the arbitrators pretty much at large in the formulation of remedies....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Bauer, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.