· 7/1/1994
Ahmad Baravati v. Josephthal, Lyon & Ross, Incorporated, and Peter Sheib
Citations
- 28 F.3d 704
- 9 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1127
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 16587
- 1994 WL 314348
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that judicial review of arbitration awards under the FAA was so “tightly limited” that “perhaps it ought not be called ‘review’ at all”
- stating as qualification that \[t]his disagreement does not bear directly on the present case\
- stating as qualification that “[t]his disagreement does not bear directly on the present case”
- rejecting the idea that a court reviews even for clear error
- “Judicial review of arbitration awards is tightly limited; perhaps it ought not be called ‘review’ at all.”
- “It is commonplace to leave the arbitrators pretty much at large in the formulation of remedies....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Bauer, Tinder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.