Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• fragmenting damages over a person’s life expectancy, though illuminating, may be misleading
• fragmenting damages over a person's life expectancy, though illuminating, may be misleading
• “Unlike loss of earnings or the cost of a medical attendant, pain, suffering, and disability recoveries cannot be reduced to mathematical formulae, and on this theory they have been exempted from deductions for present worth.”
• cost of daily health attendant care was discounted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).