Skip to main content
· 7/17/1991

Ahls v. Sherwood/Division of Harsco Corp.

Citations

  • 473 N.W.2d 619
  • 1991 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 249
  • 1991 WL 130359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that remedy is dismissal of appeal when appellate court has no jurisdiction to consider appeal
  • finding an order that anticipated dismissal but did not itself order dismissal “was not a final order for appeal purposes”
  • “Recognition of finality here, moreover, will not offend our policy against piecemeal appeals because there are no remaining issues to be tried or appealed.”
  • “A final judgment is one which conclusively adjudicates all of the rights of the parties . . . .” (emphasis added)
  • “Recognition of finality here, moreover, will not offend our policy against piecemeal appeals because there are no remaining issues to be tried or appealed.”
  • “An 14 interlocutory order is not the law of the case because the court is free to change it at a later time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Larson, Carter, Neuman, Snell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.