Ahlers v. Rabinowitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government interest in rehabilitating prisoners convicted of sexually abusing minors justified withholding “images of children in bathing suits”
• concluding that eleven instances of delayed or withheld mail over four months did not violate First Amendment
• concluding that eleven instances of delayed or withheld mail over four months did not state a First Amendment claim
• holding that procedural due process claim was insufficiently alleged where plaintiff did not “allege[] whether formal post-deprivation procedures were available to him”
• holding that “eleven instances over four months does not in itself support an inference of regular interference,” where mail was returned to plaintiff within two to six weeks
• holding that allegations of eleven interferences with non-legal mail, resulting in delays in receipt from two to six weeks over the course of five months, was insufficient to state a cognizable claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).