· 3/3/1893
Ahlendorf v. First National Bank
Citations
- 6 Ind. App. 316
- 33 N.E. 529
- 1893 Ind. App. LEXIS 141
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- consent to jurisdiction was permissive where it did not specify that the consented-to jurisdiction was exclusive
- “Canada is not unsuitable . . . simply because the rights and legal protections provided by Canadian law may be less extensive than those afforded by United States law.” (alteration added; citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gavin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.