Skip to main content
· 3/3/1893

Ahlendorf v. First National Bank

Citations

  • 6 Ind. App. 316
  • 33 N.E. 529
  • 1893 Ind. App. LEXIS 141

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • consent to jurisdiction was permissive where it did not specify that the consented-to jurisdiction was exclusive
  • “Canada is not unsuitable . . . simply because the rights and legal protections provided by Canadian law may be less extensive than those afforded by United States law.” (alteration added; citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gavin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.