Skip to main content
· 1/3/1888

Ahlborn v. Wolff

Citations

  • 118 Pa. 242
  • 11 A. 799
  • 1888 Pa. LEXIS 387

Syllabus

<p>In suit by Ahlborn against Wolff, Wm., on a note made by Wolff, R. C., to order of Wolff, Wm., indorsed consecutively by Ahlborn, Wolff, Wm., and Ortman, paid by Ahlborn after maturity and protest, evidence that the note was a renewal of an original by the same maker with Ahlborn as payee and first indorser and Wolff, Wm., second indorser, and that when indorsed by defendant the body was in blank and he indorsed it expecting and understanding, but without express agreement, that it was to be filled as said original, is insufficient to be submitted to the jury to affect the written instrument or to authorize its reformation on the ground of mistake.</p>

Judges: Clark, Gordon, Green, Paxson, Sterrett, Trunkby, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.