Ah May Ruth Lee v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Board “may deny a motion to reopen on the basis of new evidence” if “the movant would not be entitled to the discretionary grant of relief sought” (citation omitted)
• stating that to satisfy “the heavy burden required to merit a reopening of proceedings,” the new evidence “must be -3- such that [it] would likely change the result in the case” (citation omitted)
• stating BIA may deny motion to reopen based on new evidence if noncitizen fails to establish a prima facie case for the relief sought

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).