Court of Appeals of Texas· 9/13/1983
Aguilar v. State
Citations
- 658 S.W.2d 802
- 1983 Tex. App. LEXIS 5085
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- error in recital of date of an offense after date of conviction and judgment used for enhancement does not make judgment void
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carver, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Burns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-05-03· cited 192×
- Hightower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-11-18· cited 166×
- Gray v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1982-05-05· cited 65×
- Stephens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-05-21· cited 54×
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-12-12· cited 40×
- Medlock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-10-31· cited 40×
- Shirley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-11-28· cited 37×
- Huffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-02-25· cited 36×
- Archie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-07-24· cited 33×
- Chatman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-09-18· cited 29×
- Krzesinski v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1960-03-16· cited 24×
- Newby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1964-10-28· cited 15×
- Bush v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1953-06-10· cited 13×
- Almaraz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1964-03-04· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.