Aguallo v. City of Scottsbluff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding case because conflicting evidence surrounding whether discretionary function applied prevented determination of such as matter of law
• “Given that the trial court did not resolve whether the City should have anticipated that persons . . . would fail to protect themselves despite the open and obvious nature of the risk, we will not do so on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).