Agrilink Foods, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “‘a statute is not ambiguous merely because different interpretations are conceivable’” (quoting State v. Hahn, 83 Wn. App. 825, 831, 924 P.2d 392 (1996))
• analyzing plain language of tax statute and declining to add a requirement not included by the legislature
• analyzing plain language of tax statute and declining to add a requirement not included by the legislature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).