Agriform Co. v. Swink

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing defendant’s argument that Plaintiffs prayer for punitive damages was insufficient because it made “bare conclusory allegations of oppression, fraud or malice” because conclusory pleading is sufficient
• “While California law governs Plaintiffs substantive claim for punitive damages ..., the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure govern the punitive damages claim procedurally with respect to the adequacy of pleadings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).