Skip to main content
· 2/13/2009

Agricommodities, Inc. v. J. D. Heiskell & Co.

Citations

  • 676 S.E.2d 847
  • 297 Ga. App. 210
  • 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 480
  • 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that, based upon appellant’s own admitted knowledge of how industry operated, reliance on alleged promise was unreasonable
  • upholding grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant on promissory estoppel claim because plaintiffs reliance was unreasonable as a matter of law in part due to fact that trade confirmation specifically provided that it was “subject to credit approval”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Mikell, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.