Agri Process Innovations, Inc. v. Envirotrol, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting in support of the court’s decision that MAI 18.01 provides that “when agency is in issue, the verdict director shall be modified to submit to the jury the question of whether the agent acted within the ‘scope and course of his agency.’ ”
• “Argument by counsel is no substitute for proper direction from the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).