Agracat, Inc. v. AFS-NWA, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “specific instructions could make such duties required and thus ministerial.”
• stating that discretionary acts involve “the exercise of discretion and judgment, or personal deliberation, decision, and judgment”
• stating that discretionary acts are those which “call[] for a ‘good faith judgment call[] made in a legally uncertain environment.’” (quoting Yanero, 65 S.W.3d at 522)
• stating that discretionary acts are those which “call[] for a ‘good faith judgment call[] made in a legally uncertain environment.’” (quoting Yanero, 65 S.W.3d at 522)
• stating that discretionary acts are those which “call[] for a ‘good faith judgment call[] made in a legally uncertain environment.’” (quoting Yanero, 65 S.W.3d at 522)
• explaining that “[t]he distinction between discretionary acts and mandatory acts is essentially the difference between making higher-level decisions and giving orders to effectuate those decisions, and simply following orders”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).