Skip to main content
· 7/10/1918

Agostinis v. Piekarski

Citations

  • 70 Pa. Super. 279
  • 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 230

Syllabus

<p>Gontract — Building contract — Architect—Principal and agent— Review.</p> <p>An order of the Common Pleas refusing an appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Allegheny County on a verdict for defendant in an action of assumpsit, will not be reversed on appeal, where it appears that defendant was sought to be charged for extra work under a building contract ordered by an architect, but that there was no evidence to show any authority given by the defendant to the architect to make defendant personally liable for such work.</p>

Judges: Head, Henderson, Kephart, Orlady, Porter, Trexler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.