Skip to main content
· 12/4/1998

Agonafer v. Rubin

Citations

  • 35 F. Supp. 2d 300
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21179
  • 78 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1565
  • 1998 WL 937405

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidence of “clear and deliberate violation of collective bargaining agreement procedures” supported an inference that the defendant’s proffered reason was mere pretext
  • evidence of “clear and deliberate violation of the collective bargaining agreement procedures relating to priority consideration” supported an inference that defendant’s proffered reason was mere pretext

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brieant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.