Agnew v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the NCAA’s scholarship rules may restrain trade in a “labor market for student-athletes” and noting that “labor markets are cognizable under the Sherman Act”
• holding that a complaint “may not be amended by briefs in opposition to a motion to dismiss.”
• holding that a complaint “may not be amended by briefs in opposition to a motion to dismiss.”
• holding that “the Sherman Act ap- plies to the NCAA bylaws generally”
• holding that “the Sherman Act ap- plies to the NCAA bylaws generally”
• holding that “the Sherman Act ap- plies to the NCAA bylaws generally”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).