Skip to main content
· 12/28/1984

Agnes L. Morse v. Elmira Country Club

Citations

  • 752 F.2d 35
  • 40 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 573
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15544

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • characterizing the former Rule 4(c)(2)(C)(ii) as containing \the method of serving process by mail\
  • limitations period tolled when service proper under 4(c)(2)(C)(ii) but defendant willfully refused to return acknowledgment of service
  • mail service effective where the recipient received the mail and accordingly obtained actual notice; no discussion as to when service complete
  • “The Walker and Hanna decisions demonstrate that (a) the running of limitations in this case is governed by the New York rule that limitations is tolled only by service of process, but (b) the Federal Rules control the proper method of effecting service.”
  • summons tolls period under Vermont law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Cardamone, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.