Agin v. Public Utilities Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a “casual similarity” between the grounds alleged on rehearing and the arguments in the appellant’s brief does not satisfy the specificity requirements of R.C. 4903.10
• a “casual similarity” between the grounds stated in the rehearing application and the statements in the appellants’ brief does not meet the requirements of R.C. 4903.10
• a “casual similarity” between the grounds stated in the rehearing application and the statements in the appellants’ brief does not meet the requirements of R.C. 4903.10

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).