Agahi v. Kelly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Padilla does not apply retroa c tively to cases on collateral review
• holding that No. 11‐2676 Page 4 Padilla does not apply retroactively on collateral review
• concluding that Padilla announced a new rule in part because it required criminal defense attorneys, for the first time, “to provide advice about matters not directly related to their client’s criminal prosecution”
• holding that Padilla does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review
• noting that a Supreme Court rule is likely to be new “if the lower courts were split on the issue”
• noting that a Supreme Court rule is likely to be new “if the lower courts were split on the issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).