Skip to main content

A.G. v. State

Citations

  • 718 So. 2d 854
  • 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10847

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that victim, as owner, was qualified to testify as to the value of property stolen from him, particularly a family heirloom
  • holding that the owner’s own estimate of value that was “based on what his jeweler and his wife had told him” was sufficient to support the order of restitution
  • stating that restitu tion in a juvenile proceeding under section 39.054(l)(f), Florida Statutes (1995), the predecessor to current section 985.437, “is treated the same as restitution in adult proceedings under section 775.089”
  • “The trial court has broad discretion to take into account any factor in arriving at a fair amount that will compensate the victim for his or her loss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gross, Owen, Stone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.