AFSCME Local 2623 v. Department of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• so explaining in connection with judicial review under ORS 183.400 of another rule promulgated by DOC
• department’s choice to adopt rules permitting war-rantless searches of prison employees in certain circumstances “is reasonably related to the Department’s specific statutory duty”
• “We emphasize at the outset the limited scope of the Court of Appeals’ review (and ours) under ORS 183.400.”
• “Numerous individual fact situations can arise under any rule, but judicial review of the rule as applied to each of those situa- tions is reserved to other forums.”
• “Numerous individual fact situations can arise under any rule, but judicial review of the rule as applied to each of those situations is reserved to other forums.”
• “Numerous individual fact situations can arise under any rule, but judicial review of the rule as applied to each of those situa- tions is reserved to other forums.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).