Skip to main content
· 4/8/1993

A.F.P. Enterprises, Inc. v. Crescent Pork, Inc.

Citations

  • 611 N.E.2d 619
  • 243 Ill. App. 3d 905
  • 183 Ill. Dec. 356
  • 1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 485

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, “in deciding the merits of [a section 2-619] motion, a trial court cannot determine disputed factual issues solely upon affidavits and counteraffidavits”
  • in deciding the merits of a section 2 — 619 motion, a trial court cannot determine disputed factual issues solely upon affidavits and counteraffidavits; if affidavits present disputed facts, the parties must be afforded the opportunity to have an evidentiary hearing
  • in deciding the merits of a section 2--619 motion, a trial court cannot determine disputed factual issues solely upon affidavits and counteraffidavits; if affidavits present disputed facts, the parties must be afforded the opportunity to have an evidentiary hearing
  • when there is an honest dispute of the amount due and the debtor tenders a check with the explicit understanding of both parties that it is full payment of all demands, acceptance and negotiation of a check with notice of the condition is an accord and satisfaction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.