AFL Network Services v. Thomas Heglund

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a mere email stating that a positive test occurred is insufficient without additional information about who performed the test or an officer's opinion based on his training and experience that the substance was an intoxicant
• noting that a prison guard’s lay identification of substance may be sufficient to support disciplinary hearing findings depending on guard’s training and experience
• noting, in prison-discipline context, that guard’s lay identification of substance might be sufficient depending on guard’s training and experience
• hearing officer may not \refuse to consider an inmate's evidence simply because other evidence supports a finding of guilt\
• “[A] hearing officer cannot refuse to consider an inmate’s evidence simply because other evidence supports a finding of guilt.”
• \a hearing officer's decision need only rest on 'some evidence' logically supporting it and demonstrating that the result is not arbitrary.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).