Skip to main content
· 12/20/1988

AFL-CIO v. McLaughlin

Citations

  • 702 F. Supp. 307
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14697
  • 1988 WL 138093

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stressing “that this case was not remanded to the Department so it might reexamine its . . . policy”; rather, “the Department was simply required to furnish a rational 5 explanation for its actions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sporkin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.