Affiliated Construction Group, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that contracting officer was not required to “infer from the language of the claim” that contractor “was really contending that the conditions of the site differed from those assumed in the contract”
• “To determine whether a contractor’s claim in court constitutes a ‘new claim,’ the court must assess ‘whether the new issue is based on the same set of operative facts’ as the claim submitted to the contracting officer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).