Affeldt v. Carr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “all the [judge’s] acts ... could have been appealed either directly or by extraordinary writ” and therefore plaintiff had an adequate remedy at law despite judicial immunity
• noting that gag orders do not violate a party’s free speech rights so long as there is evidence that the Court finds “imminent prejudice to the administration of justice”
• magistrate judge overseeing pretrial matters, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), had authority to issue “gag order” directing new class counsel not to speak to or associate with disqualified class counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).